Jili Bet

Understanding PVL Odds: How to Calculate Your True Risk and Survival Chances

As a researcher specializing in risk assessment methodologies, I've always been fascinated by how probability calculations translate into real-world scenarios. Let me share something unexpected - I recently found myself drawing parallels between my professional work and the dark fantasy world of Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver. The concept of PVL odds, or Probability of Violent Loss, isn't just for insurance actuaries and epidemiologists anymore. In Nosgoth's decaying landscape, every character faces their own version of PVL calculations, whether they realize it or not.

Take Raziel's transformation, for instance. When he developed those magnificent wings - an evolutionary leap that should have been celebrated - his PVL odds skyrocketed from maybe 5% to nearly 95% in Kain's eyes. See, that's the thing about calculating true risk - it's never just about the numbers. It's about perception, power dynamics, and context. Kain perceived Raziel's evolution not as progress but as a direct threat to his supremacy. The moment those wings emerged, Raziel's survival chances plummeted dramatically, leading to his eternal punishment in the Lake of the Dead. I've seen similar patterns in corporate environments where innovation gets punished rather than rewarded - though admittedly with less dramatic consequences than centuries of rotting.

What most people don't understand about risk calculation is that it's rarely about single factors. When Raziel was resurrected by that mysterious dormant god, his survival chances shifted again - but this time, the calculation included new variables. His physical form had changed, his purpose had transformed, and his knowledge of the world had expanded through centuries of suffering. If I were to quantify it, I'd estimate his post-resurrection survival odds improved from 10% to around 65%, accounting for his spectral abilities and burning vengeance.

The revenge path Raziel embarks on presents another fascinating case study in sequential probability. Each brother he targets represents what we'd call a conditional probability event - the success of each mission depends on the outcomes of previous ones. If he has an 80% chance against each individual brother, but needs to defeat all four before facing Kain, his cumulative probability of success drops to about 41% by the time he reaches his former master. That's assuming independent events, which they're clearly not, since each victory potentially alerts the next target.

Here's where it gets personally interesting to me - I've noticed that in both fictional worlds and real life, people consistently underestimate the impact of emotional variables on risk calculations. Raziel's burning vengeance isn't just dramatic flavor - it's a quantifiable factor that might increase his combat effectiveness by 15-20% while simultaneously decreasing his strategic thinking capacity by a similar margin. I've made this mistake myself in business decisions, letting passion override probability, and the results are rarely pretty.

The human survivors in Nosgoth's walled cities face their own grim probability calculations. With vampires as apex predators and their numbers dwindling by approximately 7% annually according to my estimates, their long-term survival chances look bleak - maybe 23% over the next century without significant intervention. Their risk assessment would need to account for food supplies, defensive capabilities, and the constant threat of Raziel's brothers continuing their siege operations.

What strikes me as particularly insightful about this narrative is how it demonstrates that survival chances aren't static. Raziel's initial 100% mortality probability when thrown into the Lake of the Dead somehow became 0% when the dormant god intervened. In my professional experience, this mirrors how quickly real-world situations can change - a terminal diagnosis overturned by new treatment, a failing business saved by unexpected investment. The numbers guide us, but they don't dictate our fates.

Kain's own risk assessment methodology fascinates me because it's fundamentally flawed by arrogance. He calculates threats based on maintaining his despotic rule, ignoring the long-term probability of rebellion or external intervention. His approach reminds me of certain executives I've consulted for - so focused on immediate threats that they miss the gradual erosion of their position. If Kain had properly assessed the cumulative risk of turning all his lieutenants into potential enemies, he might have made different choices.

The beauty of understanding PVL odds lies in recognizing that while we can't eliminate risk entirely, we can make more informed decisions about which risks are worth taking. Raziel's decision to pursue vengeance, despite the mathematical improbability of success, reflects how human (or vampire) emotion can override cold calculation. Sometimes, the most meaningful paths are statistically unlikely ones.

In my own practice, I've learned that the most accurate risk assessments account for the unquantifiable - things like honor, vengeance, love, or in Raziel's case, the intervention of dormant gods. The numbers give us a framework, but the human (or vampire) elements determine our actual survival chances. As we navigate our own versions of Nosgoth, whether in business, health, or personal relationships, remembering that probability serves us rather than commands us might be the most important survival skill of all.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover