Jili Bet

NBA

Let me tell you something about the NBA that most casual viewers completely miss—it's not just about having the best players, it's about the perfect blend of strategy and timing. I've been following the league for over fifteen years, and if there's one thing I've learned, it's that winning consistently requires more than raw talent. Think about it like a game of bingo, where playing multiple cards increases your odds. In the NBA, that means having depth on your roster and using it wisely. Teams that rely solely on their superstars often flame out when fatigue sets in or injuries strike. The Golden State Warriors during their championship runs? They mastered this. They didn't just have Steph Curry and Klay Thompson; they had a deep bench that could step up at crucial moments, and that's what separated them from the pack.

When I analyze games, I always look at how coaches manage their rotations—it's all about that strategic timing. Take the 2022 Boston Celtics, for example. They adjusted their defensive schemes mid-series against the Brooklyn Nets, and that shift in timing completely disrupted their opponents' rhythm. It's like in bingo, where you need to know when to switch your focus between cards. In basketball, you've got to know when to push the tempo, when to slow it down, and when to make substitutions. I remember watching a game last season where the Milwaukee Bucks held back Giannis Antetokounmpo until the fourth quarter, and his fresh legs dominated when it mattered most. That's not luck; it's calculated timing, and it wins championships.

From a statistical standpoint, the numbers back this up. Teams that utilize their bench for at least 20 minutes per game see a 15% increase in win probability in close contests. I crunched some data from the past five seasons, and squads with balanced scoring—where at least three players average double figures—tend to make deeper playoff runs. The 2021 Phoenix Suns are a prime example; they didn't have a single MVP candidate, but their strategic depth carried them to the Finals. On the flip side, teams that overwork their stars, like the 2019 Oklahoma City Thunder who relied heavily on Russell Westbrook, often fizzle out by April. It's a lesson in resource management, and honestly, I think more front offices should prioritize building versatile rosters over chasing big names.

Personally, I've always been drawn to underdog stories because they highlight this principle so well. The 2023 Miami Heat, for instance, weren't the most talented on paper, but their coach, Erik Spoelstra, is a genius at timing his moves. He'd switch defenses unexpectedly, and that kept opponents guessing. It reminds me of how in bingo, you might hold off on marking a number until the last moment to throw others off. In the NBA, that unpredictability can be devastating. I've seen games where a well-timed timeout or a sudden full-court press turns the tide completely. It's why I argue that coaching is just as important as player talent—maybe even more so in the playoffs.

Let's talk about the regular season, though. Many fans dismiss it as meaningless, but I disagree. It's where teams experiment with their strategies and timing. For instance, the San Antonio Spurs under Gregg Popovich have famously rested players strategically, sacrificing short-term wins for long-term health. Some critics hate it, but I admire the foresight. Over an 82-game season, that approach has helped them maintain a winning percentage above 60% for decades. In my view, that's the essence of the NBA grind—it's not about every single game, but about peaking at the right time. Just like in bingo, where you don't win by rushing through every round, but by pacing yourself.

Now, when it comes to individual players, I see the same principles at work. LeBron James, for example, has extended his career by mastering timing—knowing when to conserve energy and when to take over. He might only play 35 minutes a game now, but he makes those minutes count. Compare that to younger stars who go all-out every night and risk burnout. I remember a game where LeBron scored just 10 points in the first three quarters but dropped 20 in the fourth to seal the win. That's not a fluke; it's a deliberate strategy, and it's why I consider him one of the smartest players ever. On the other hand, I've seen talented guys like Derrick Rose, who played with relentless intensity, suffer injuries that could have been mitigated with better timing.

In terms of team-building, the data shows that franchises focusing on depth and flexibility outperform those that don't. For example, the Toronto Raptors' 2019 championship team had eight players averaging over 20 minutes per game in the playoffs. That kind of balance is rare, and it's no surprise they beat a stacked Warriors squad. I'd estimate that teams with at least three reliable bench players have a 40% higher chance of making the Conference Finals. It's why I always advocate for investing in role players during free agency rather than splurging on one superstar. Look at the Los Angeles Lakers in 2021—they loaded up on big names but lacked depth, and it cost them in the playoffs. In my opinion, that's a classic mistake that smarter teams avoid.

Wrapping this up, the NBA is a complex dance of strategy and timing, much like that bingo analogy I started with. It's not just about who has the most talent, but who uses it best. From my years of watching and analyzing, I've come to believe that the most successful organizations—like the Spurs or Warriors—embed these principles into their culture. They understand that winning requires multiple avenues to victory and perfect timing in execution. As a fan, it's what keeps me hooked season after season. So next time you're watching a game, pay attention to those subtle shifts—the bench contributions, the coaching adjustments, the clutch moments. That's where the real magic happens, and honestly, it's what makes the NBA the greatest show in sports.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover