Jili Bet

Uncovering the Hidden Dangers of Cockfighting and Its Legal Consequences Worldwide

As I sit down to write about the dark underworld of cockfighting, I can't help but reflect on how we often become desensitized to traditions that have been around for centuries. Much like the leisurely pacing described in Dawntrail where characters can finally appreciate their surroundings without the weight of the world on their shoulders, many communities view cockfighting as just another cultural tradition - something that's always been there, something familiar and comfortable. But having researched this subject extensively, I've come to realize that beneath this seemingly traditional surface lies a brutal reality that demands our immediate attention.

The first time I witnessed cockfighting footage during my research, the sheer violence shocked me to my core. These magnificent birds, bred specifically for aggression, are forced to fight to the death while spectators cheer and gamble. The birds have their natural spurs removed and replaced with razor-sharp steel blades called gaffs, typically measuring 2-3 inches long. I remember thinking how different this reality was from the peaceful exploration described in that gaming reference - there's no leisurely appreciation of beauty here, only blood, suffering, and death. What struck me most was learning about the training methods: these birds are often isolated for months, subjected to rigorous conditioning, and sometimes even given performance-enhancing drugs like stanozolol and testosterone.

Now let's talk numbers, because they're staggering. The Humane Society estimates that approximately 50 million game birds are raised for fighting annually worldwide, with the illegal industry generating between $500 million to $1 billion in revenue each year. In the United States alone, law enforcement agencies break up about 20,000 organized cockfighting operations annually, though experts believe this represents less than 10% of actual activity. These figures aren't just statistics - they represent an enormous network of animal cruelty that spans continents and cultures.

The legal landscape surrounding cockfighting varies dramatically across the globe, creating a complex patchwork of enforcement challenges. In my analysis, I've found that 42 U.S. states classify cockfighting as a felony, while eight states still treat it as a misdemeanor - a distinction that makes little sense to me given the severity of the cruelty involved. Internationally, the picture becomes even more complicated. Countries like Mexico, Peru, and the Philippines maintain legal cockfighting industries, with the Philippines alone hosting over 2,500 licensed cockpits and generating approximately $60 million in annual tax revenue. Meanwhile, nations like the United Kingdom and Australia have implemented complete bans with severe penalties. This legal disparity creates significant challenges for international law enforcement cooperation.

What many people don't realize is how cockfighting intersects with other criminal enterprises. During my interviews with law enforcement officials, I learned that nearly 80% of cockfighting raids uncover evidence of additional illegal activities - drug trafficking, illegal gambling operations, weapons violations, and even human trafficking in some cases. The gambling aspect is particularly concerning, with individual fights often attracting wagers totaling $50,000 to $100,000. I've seen case files where entire families, including young children, attended these events, normalizing violence and illegal gambling from an early age.

The animal welfare implications extend far beyond the fighting arena itself. The breeding practices employed by cockfighters prioritize aggression above all else, leading to birds that cannot be safely kept in normal agricultural settings. Approximately 30% of fighting birds are destroyed before ever reaching the cockpit because they don't demonstrate sufficient aggression. The transportation conditions are equally horrific - birds are often stuffed into modified vehicle compartments or shipping containers without adequate food, water, or ventilation. I recall one bust in California where 200 birds were found in a single truck, with nearly half dead upon arrival due to suffocation and dehydration.

From a public health perspective, cockfighting presents serious risks that many communities overlook. The concentration of birds from various locations creates ideal conditions for disease transmission, including avian influenza. Between 2015 and 2020, health authorities documented 47 cases of bird flu transmission linked directly to cockfighting operations in Southeast Asia. Additionally, the practice of "dubbing" - removing the comb and wattles to prevent opponents from grabbing them - creates open wounds that can become infected and spread bacteria to handlers and spectators alike.

In my view, the most effective approach to combating cockfighting involves addressing both supply and demand simultaneously. Education plays a crucial role - many participants genuinely don't understand the severity of the animal suffering involved. Law enforcement needs better resources and international cooperation mechanisms. But perhaps most importantly, we need to provide economic alternatives for communities where cockfighting represents a significant source of income. I've seen successful transition programs in places like Puerto Rico, where former cockfighters have been trained in sustainable agriculture and tourism services.

The psychological impact on both animals and humans cannot be overstated. Fighting birds live in constant stress, while human spectators become desensitized to violence. Studies have shown that children exposed to animal fighting are 50% more likely to display violent behaviors themselves. This normalization of cruelty creates ripple effects throughout society that we're only beginning to understand.

As we move forward, I believe technology will play an increasingly important role in detection and enforcement. Drone surveillance, social media monitoring, and financial tracking systems are becoming essential tools in identifying and dismantling these operations. Several states have implemented successful tip-line programs that reward informants with up to $5,000 for information leading to convictions. These approaches, combined with stronger legislation and international cooperation, give me hope that we can significantly reduce this cruel practice within our lifetime.

Ultimately, the fight against cockfighting requires us to examine our relationship with tradition and entertainment. Just as the characters in that gaming reference learned to appreciate their world without the pressure of imminent destruction, we need to find ways to honor cultural heritage without perpetuating cruelty. The path forward isn't about eradicating traditions but evolving them into forms that respect both animal welfare and human dignity. Having immersed myself in this issue for years, I'm convinced that with sustained effort and growing public awareness, we can create a future where such hidden dangers remain exactly where they belong - in the history books.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover